When the
puritans first settled in North America their intention was to escape religious
confines. They sought to form their own nation where there would be religious
freedom and a separation of church and state. However, unknowingly these
refugees built a foundation that would later suppress foreign religion. Due to
this historical Christian tie, a sense of public Protestantism has manifested
in American culture. As a result Christianity dominates the religious realm in
the United States while other “ethnic religions” are forced to either change
their religion or adopt Christian beliefs. Still, these diverse minority groups
struggle to keep their faiths alive in the United States.
Public Protestantism became
ingrained in American Culture during the 17th century when the
puritans settled and instilled certain ethos and priorities that held a
prominent role in government1.
As a result Protestantism found it’s way atop the social order. Christian
influence did not slow down; by 1893 Christians attempted to further expand
their supremacy at the Columbian Exposition in Chicago. The fair was purposely
set up to make Christianity glow as the religion of the world, with all of the
other religions left organized to appear primitive2. The end result
was actually quite the opposite for religious leaders such as Swami Vivekananda,
shocked the public with beautiful speeches about their religion. However, Vivekananda
was not successful in presenting his religion of Hinduism but rather he was
successful in presenting a new form of export Hinduism that was better accepted
by Americans.
Religion that did not originate in
United States often changes drastically upon entering American society. This
change can be referred to as the difference between “ethnic religion” and
“export religion”. Ethnic religion is
the religion practiced by the immigrant while export religion is the new
Americanized form of that religion that often followed by the next generation. Religions
are forced to change once they enter the United States so that they become
“normal” and fit into a society dominated by Protestantism4. These
religions are susceptible to racialization. Racialization is when we put a
certain face on religion3; it is apparent in the depiction of monks
in the United States.
In the United States there is an
image that links all eastern monks together. Though these monks can be a part
of completely different religious backgrounds they are tied together by the
persona of Oriental Monk. The oriental monk is seen as a caregiver, a sort of
nurturer5. Thus, here in the United States, religions like Hinduism
and Buddhism have changed into lifestyles rather than religion. Americans have
taken these religions and cultivated them into lifestyles rather than follow
the original texts and foundation of the religion. Conservatives of the ethnic
religions try to return to their roots but the most successful groups conform
to the export tradition of the religion. Sadly, it seems that true religious
freedom does not exist here in the United States.
It is apparent that the United
States is not truly a haven for those seeking religious freedom. Rather,
diverse minority traditions are forced to conform in a Christianized society.
Outsiders deem these groups as “different” and do not accept them unless they
fulfill certain standards. As a result these ethnic religions have transformed
into new export religions. Protestantism governs what religion is in America. Still,
we find followers of ethnic religion doing whatever they can to keep their
religions alive in the U.S.
1Khyati Y. Joshi, “The Racialization of
Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States” (Massachusetts: Routledge,
2006), 215
2Richard Seager, The Midway Plaisance and
the Magic of the White City, (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University
Press, 1995), 26.
3 Joshi 214
4 William Hutchinson, Pluralism in the
United States, (Ann Harbor Michigan: Sheridan Books, 2003).
5Jane Iwamura, The Orient Monk in American
Culture, (California: UC Press, 2000), 36.